MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3012462332 · doi:10.52447/gij.v3i2.1676

ANALISIS KEBIJAKAN LUAR NEGERI KANADA STUDI KASUS MUNDURNYA KANADA DARI PROTOKOL KYOTO TAHUN 2011

2018· article· en· W3012462332 on OpenAlex
indra Saputra, Lelly Andriasanti

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGLOBAL INSIGHT JOURNAL · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Policies and Emissions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKyoto ProtocolPolitical scienceEconomyClimate changeEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACTThe withdrawal Canada from Kyoto Protocol on 2011 was one of Canada's foreign policy in dealing with environmental problems like climate change. This research aims to determine the impact of these policies for global environment, factors that affect this policy, and policy formulation.The result of this research indicate that impact of Canada’s withdrawal for global environment like increasing global emissions and threatened the existence of the Kyoto Protocol. After that, the factors that affect Canada to withdraw was the economic competition with NAFTA countries, Kyoto’s system, Canada’s geographic and nature conditions, Canada’s economic condition, Canada’s political process; and the failure of Canada to realize Protocol Kyoto’s target. At the last, Canada’s foreign policy formulation was done in four steps. Those are, identify national interest, identify options, consideration of each option, and choose policy option that best serves national interest.Key Words: Climate Change, Kyoto Protocol, Canada’s Foreign Policy ABSTRAKMundurnya Kanada dari Protokol Kyoto di tahun 2011 adalah salah satu bentuk kebijakan luar negeri Kanada dalam menangani masalah lingkungan seperti perubahan iklim. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dampak kebijakan ini bagi lingkungan global, faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kebijakan tersebut, dan bagaimana kebijakan tersebut dirumuskan.Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa dampak penarikan Kanada bagi lingkungan global seperti peningkatan emisi global dan terancamnya eksistensi Protokol Kyoto. Setelah itu, faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi Kanada untuk mundur antara lain seperti persaingan ekonomi dengan negara-negara anggota NAFTA, sistem dalam Protokol Kyoto, kondisi geografis, kondisi perekonomian, proses politik; dan kegagalan Kanada untuk mencapai target Protokol Kyoto. Terakhir, perumusan kebijakan luar negeri Kanada dilakukan dalam empat langkah. Langkah tersebut antara lain mengidentifikasi kepentingan nasional, mengidentifikasi opsi-opsi yang tersedia, pertimbangan masing-masing opsi, dan memilih opsi kebijakan yang terbaik sesuai kepentingan nasional.Kata kunci: Perubahan Iklim, Protokol Kyoto, Kebijakan Luar Negeri Kanada

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.247
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it