A Layer-Partitioning Approach for Faster Execution of Neural Network-Based Embedded Applications in Edge Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As embedded systems become more prominent in society, the technologies that run on them must be used efficiently. One such technology is the Neural Network (NN). NN's, combined with the Internet of Things (IoT), can utilize the massive amounts of data produced to optimize, control, and automate embedded systems, giving them more functionality than ever before. However, the status quo of offloading all NN functionality onto external devices has many flaws. It forces the embedded system to entirely rely on networks that may have high latency or connection issues. Networks may also expose them to security risks. To reduce the reliance of IoT devices on networks, we examined several solutions, such as delegating some NN's to run solely on the IoT device or splitting the NN and distributing the subnetworks into different devices. It was found that, for shallow NN's, the IoT device itself could run the NN at a rate faster than offloading it to an external device, but the IoT device needed to offload its inputs once the NN's started to increase in layers and complexity. When splitting the NN, it was found that the number of messages sent between devices could be reduced by up to 97% while only reducing the accuracy of the NN by 3%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it