De la mémoire médiatique des temps de guerre. Le travail de mémoire, les cadres paratextuels et les stratégies narratives dans Effroyables jardins de Michel Quint et son adaptation cinématographique par Jean Becker
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans cet article, l’auteur analyse les approches médiatiques du roman Effroyables Jardins de l’écrivain français Michel Quint (2000) et de son adaptation cinématographique (2002) par Jean Becker. L’accent est mis sur les stratégies narratives et paratextuelles utilisées pour véhiculer les ambiguïtés psychologiques de l’Histoire, présentes tant dans le roman que dans le film. L’analyse révèle une contextualisation cohérente des moyens littéraires et audiovisuels employés pour déconstruire l’idée d’une vision simpliste de la Deuxième Guerre mondiale et du temps de l’occupation allemande en France. L’auteur démontre que dans le cas du roman et du film, il s’agit de véritables lieux de mémoire franco-allemands construits à l’aide d’une imbrication unique d’événements narratifs et d’éléments intermédiaux, ainsi qu’une constellation sophistiquée de personnages et de ruptures temporelles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".