MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Factors Associated with Pressure Ulcers in Adults in Acute Care Hospitals

2004· article· en· W3012842909 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Skin & Wound Care · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalQueen's UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLogistic regressionAcute careGoodness of fitCross-sectional studyPhysical therapyInternal medicineStatisticsHealth carePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: To identify and describe the relationship of factors associated with pressure ulcers in adults in acute care hospitals. DESIGN: Cross-sectional prevalence studies. SETTING: University teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Prevalence studies conducted from 1993 to 1995 with a total of 1992 subjects served as the derivation sample and a 1996 prevalence study with 581 subjects served as the validation sample. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pressure ulcers and the Braden risk assessment subscale scores. DATA ANALYSIS: Logistic regression analysis was used to derive a model that fit the data and performed well at identifying factors associated with pressure ulcers. Performance of the model, in terms of calibration, was statistically evaluated using the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. The effectiveness of the model, in terms of discrimination, was assessed by considering the cut-off values using 2 by 2 classification tables to measure the overall percentage of subjects correctly classified in the validation sample. MAIN RESULTS: Factors associated with pressure ulcers in adults in acute care hospitals were identified as age, male gender, sensory perception, moisture, mobility, nutrition, and friction/shear. Three interactions were also found to be associated with pressure ulcers; 2 interactions (age and sensory perception and moisture and sensory perception) were negatively associated and 1 interaction (nutrition and gender/male) was positively associated with pressure ulcers. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test for the derivation sample (.76) and the validation sample (.79) indicated that the model was well calibrated and a good fit. The overall percentage of subjects correctly classified using the validation sample was 88%, indicating that the model performed well. CONCLUSIONS: : This study enhances the knowledge of the relationship of factors associated with pressure ulcers in adults in acute care populations and enhances the use and relative importance of particular Braden Scale sub-scales.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.106
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it