Conversion of diffusely abnormal white matter to focal lesions is linked to progression in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Diffusely abnormal white matter (DAWM) regions are observed in magnetic resonance images of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) patients. However, their role in clinical progression is still not established. Objectives: To characterize the longitudinal volumetric and intensity evolution of DAWM and focal white matter lesions (FWML) and assess their associations with clinical outcomes and progression in SPMS. Methods: Data include 589 SPMS participants followed up for 3 years (3951 time points). FWML and DAWM were automatically segmented. Screening DAWM volumes that transformed into FWML at the last visit (DAWM-to-FWML) and normalized T1-weighted intensities (indicating severity of damage) in those voxels were calculated. Results: FWML volume increased and DAWM volume decreased with an increase in disease duration ( p < 0.001). The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) was positively associated with FWML volumes ( p = 0.002), but not with DAWM. DAWM-to-FWML volume was higher in patients who progressed (2.75 cm 3 vs. 1.70 cm 3 ; p < 0.0001). Normalized T1-weighted intensity of DAWM-to-FWML was negatively associated with progression ( p < 0.00001). Conclusion: DAWM transformed into FWML over time, and this transformation was associated with clinical progression. DAWM-to-FWML voxels had greater normalized T1-weighted intensity decrease over time, in keeping with relatively greater tissue damage. Evaluation of DAWM in progressive multiple sclerosis provides a useful measure for therapies aiming to protect this at-risk tissue with the potential to slow progression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".