MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3013020042 · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000009284

Hyperthermia, cerebral edema, and outcome in intracerebral hemorrhage

2020· letter· en· W3013020042 on OpenAlexaff
Benjamin Lo, Jeanne Teitelbaum

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2020
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
Canadian institutionsMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCerebral edemaIntracerebral hemorrhageIschemiaAnesthesiaHyperthermiaIntracranial pressureEdemaBrain edemaCardiologySubarachnoid hemorrhageInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fevers occur in over one-third of patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Occurrence and duration of fevers have been associated with worse neurologic and functional outcomes. Fevers markedly increase cerebral metabolic rates and are thereby linked to a secondary injury cascade of increased intracranial pressure, cerebral edema, spreading ischemia, and triggered apoptosis.1–5

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurologySame topicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ResearchFrench-language works237,207