MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3013049364 · doi:10.1149/1945-7111/ab7f9e

Pt/Ru–Sn Oxide/Carbon Catalysts for Ethanol Oxidation

2020· article· en· W3013049364 on OpenAlexafffund
Hui Hang, Rakan M. Altarawneh, Tobias M. Brueckner, Peter G. Pickup

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCatalysisProton exchange membrane fuel cellSulfuric acidDirect-ethanol fuel cellChemistryInorganic chemistryOxideCarbon fibersAdsorptionThermal decompositionAqueous solutionElectrochemistryMaterials scienceElectrodeOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mixed Ru–Sn oxides have been deposited onto a high surface area carbon support by thermal decomposition of Ru and Sn acetylacetonate (acac) complexes. Adsorption of preformed Pt nanoparticles produced catalysts with enhanced low potential activity for the oxidation of ethanol in aqueous sulfuric acid at ambient temperature and in a proton exchange membrane (PEM) cell at 80 °C. Varying the oxide composition between Ru0.38Sn0.62O2 and Ru0.67Sn0.33O2 did not influence the catalyst’s activity greatly but did increase stability in the sulfuric acid solution. Higher stability was observed in the PEM cell, where a Pt/Ru0.55Sn0.45O2/C anode provided much higher currents than a commercial Pt/C catalyst for ethanol oxidation at low potentials. Anodes for direct ethanol fuel cells can be fabricated by coating a carbon fibre paper backing layer consecutively with carbon black, Ru(acac)3 + Sn(acac)2, and Pt nanoparticles, with appropriate thermal processing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of The Electrochemical SocietySame topicElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFrench-language works237,207