MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3013087864 · doi:10.1002/adfm.202070086

Quantum Dots Solar Cells: Core/Shell Quantum Dots Solar Cells (Adv. Funct. Mater. 13/2020)

2020· article· en· W3013087864 on OpenAlexaff
Gurpreet Singh Selopal, Haiguang Zhao, Zhiming M. Wang, Federico Rosei

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Functional Materials · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuantum dotMaterials scienceShell (structure)ExcitonCore (optical fiber)NanotechnologyMultiple exciton generationNanocrystalSolar cellOptoelectronicsPhysicsCondensed matter physicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In article number 1908762, Haiguang Zhao, Zhiming M. Wang, Federico Rosei, and Gurpreet Singh Selopal report on colloidal core/shell quantum dots (QDs) that exhibit promising optical and electrical properties. The recent developments in the engineering of the structure of core/shell QDs to tune exciton dynamics so as to improve the performance of QDs sensitized solar cells are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Functional MaterialsSame topicAdvanced Nanomaterials in CatalysisFrench-language works237,207