MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Data driven fault tolerant thermal management of data centers

2020· article· en· W3013091535 on OpenAlexaff
Masoud Kheradmandi, Douglas G. Down

Bibliographic record

Venue2020 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModel predictive controlComputer scienceData centerEstimatorObserver (physics)Data modelingFault toleranceFault (geology)Subspace topologyControl theory (sociology)Controller (irrigation)Identification (biology)Range (aeronautics)Real-time computingData miningControl (management)EngineeringDistributed computingArtificial intelligenceMathematicsDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work we address the problem of fault-tolerant operation of data center thermal management systems. A data driven fault tolerant control framework is proposed. First, a data driven dynamic predictive model is trained using subspace identification. This model is utilized in a model predictive controller to predict dynamic behavior of a data center. An economic model predictive control is designed to maintain temperatures within an allowable range while minimizing operational costs of the cooling system. An observer based fault diagnosis method is then developed to detect and isolate sensor faults. When a fault occurs, it is diagnosed and the corresponding measured signal is replaced with the reconstructed signal from a state estimator. The effectiveness of the proposed method is illustrated through simulations on a mechanistic data center model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.125
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2020 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC)Same topicAdvanced Control Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207