MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract B16: Identification of tumor-specific antigens shared by induced pluripotent stem cells

2020· article· en· W3013133988 on OpenAlexaff
Anca Apavaloaei, Marie‐Pierre Hardy, Jean‐David Larouche, Qingchuan Zhao, Krystel Vincent, Jean‐Philippe Laverdure, Chantal Durette, Joël Lanoix, Pierre Thibault, Claude Perreault

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Immunology Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalInstitute for Research in Immunology and Cancer
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInduced pluripotent stem cellCancer stem cellCancer immunotherapyBiologyStem cellCancer researchEmbryonic stem cellCancerImmunotherapyAntigenImmunologyCell biologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The development of cancer immunotherapeutics is limited by the tumor-specific antigen (TSA) discovery. Cancer cells and pluripotent stem cells, i.e., embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), show a significant transcriptomic overlap. Indeed, when used as prophylactic vaccines in another study, iPSCs prevented tumor growth in mouse models of lung, breast, and skin cancer, suggesting that we could mine iPSCs for the discovery of TSAs. We use a recently developed proteogenomic approach combining RNA-sequencing and mass spectrometry to characterize the immunopeptidome (MHC class I-associated peptides) of iPSCs. Analyses of hitherto one human iPS cell line allowed us to identify 9 MHC class I-associated antigens that were not expressed by normal somatic tissues and thus are likely immunogenic. 50% of these antigens were highly expressed in different cancer types from The Cancer Genome Atlas, highlighting their potential for cancer immunotherapy. Expression of these TSAs resulted from aberrant expression of noncoding genomic regions and not from mutations, making them ideal candidates for antigen-based cancer vaccines. Our study indicates which stem cell features present in cancer cells might be harnessed for cancer immunotherapy. Moreover, we show for the first time that the immunopeptidome of iPSCs reflects the state of pluripotency. Cancer stem cells are known to drive disease relapse after treatment, while cancer circulating cells possessing pluripotent stem cell features are more efficient at producing metastases. These factors indicate that treatments targeted at stemness could improve clinical outcome, and that iPSC-informed TSAs hold promise for prophylactic and therapeutic cancer vaccines. Citation Format: Anca Apavaloaei, Marie-Pierre Hardy, Jean-David Larouche, Qingchuan Zhao, Krystel Vincent, Jean-Philippe Laverdure, Chantal Durette, Joel Lanoix, Pierre Thibault, Claude Perreault. Identification of tumor-specific antigens shared by induced pluripotent stem cells [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy; 2019 Nov 17-20; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2020;8(3 Suppl):Abstract nr B16.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.518

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Immunology ResearchSame topicCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringFrench-language works237,207