MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Comparative analysis of spring mechanisms of vibroprotective chairs of road construction machines

2020· article· en· W3013248766 on OpenAlex
М. С. Корытов, V.S. Sherbakov, I. E. Pochekueva

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNauchno-tekhnicheskiy vestnik Bryanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEffects of Vibration on Health
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpring (device)Computer scienceEngineeringStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reduction of vibrations of the human operator of road and construction machinery, emerging and transmissible human operator through his workplace while driving cars, is an important task, since the vibration of the human operator adversely affect the processes of its life, performance and fatigue, precision machine executable operations etc. The advantages for use of vibration isolation systems have mechanical devices without the use of hydraulic and electric components as the more reliable and durable. Among them can be highlighted Vibration system using hopping mechanisms. Hopping mechanism provides a negative stiffness when force produced by a similar mechanism, co-directed the deviation from the equilibrium position, and increases with the deviation. The combination of such a mechanism with conventional spring provides a quasi-zero stiffness. According to the developed kinematic schemes of three jump mechanisms considered as an example: Mezis truss, rhombus mechanism, and three-point mechanism, analytical equations are constructed by direct inference that relate the value of the deflecting force of the mechanism from the movement of the working point associated with the payload in the form of a chair with a person the operator. The obtained analytical dependencies allowed a comparative analysis of the static characteristics of the three mechanisms with a jump. The overall dimensions of the mechanisms and the stiffness of the springs were taken equal. The graphs of vertically directed forces created by the considered mechanisms are given, depending on the vertical movement of the working point in the range of ten centimeters. In addition, the dependences of the values of the curvature of the functions of the vertical forces of the three mechanisms on the vertical movement of the working point are obtained by a numerical method. A comparative analysis showed the advantages of the rhombic and three-point mechanisms over the Mezis truss in terms of providing less curvature of the functions of the deflecting force from the displacements of the working point, as well as a smaller number of springs. In rhombic and three-point mechanisms, tension springs are used instead of compression springs in the Mezis truss. The greatest deflecting force with the same spring stiffness and the same overall dimensions of the mechanisms creates a three-point mechanism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.181
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it