Automatic Seamline Determination for Urban Image Mosaicking Based on Road Probability Map from the D-LinkNet Neural Network
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Image mosaicking which is a process of constructing multiple orthoimages into a single seamless composite orthoimage, is one of the key steps for the production of large-scale digital orthophoto maps (DOM). Seamline determination is one of the most difficult technologies in the automatic mosaicking of orthoimages. The seamlines that follow the centerlines of roads where no significant differences exist are beneficial to improve the quality of image mosaicking. Based on this idea, this paper proposes a novel method of seamline determination based on road probability map from the D-LinkNet neural network for urban image mosaicking. This method optimizes the seamlines at both the semantic and pixel level as follows. First, the road probability map is obtained with the D-LinkNet neural network and related post processing. Second, the preferred road areas (PRAs) are determined by binarizing the road probability map of the overlapping area in the left and right image. The PRAs are the priority areas in which the seamlines cross. Finally, the final seamlines are determined by Dijkstra’s shortest path algorithm implemented with binary min-heap at the pixel level. The experimental results of three group data sets show the advantages of the proposed method. Compared with two previous methods, the seamlines obtained by the proposed method pass through the less obvious objects and mainly follow the roads. In terms of the computational efficiency, the proposed method also has a high efficiency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".