MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

On advantages of data driven traffic classification for dynamic routing in optical networks

2020· article· en· W3013296231 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2020 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsBritish Columbia Institute of Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkNetwork topologyRouting (electronic design automation)Blocking (statistics)Static routingTraffic generation modelAdaptive routingTraffic classificationDistributed computingRouting protocolQuality of service

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we concentrate on solving the dynamic routing problem with traffic classification using the Software Defined Elastic Optical Networks framework. We first define three categories of traffic based on the CISCO Traffic Reports. Then, we propose two algorithms to solve the Routing, Modulation and Spectrum Assignment problem with the support of traffic class recognition - the Split Spectrum and the Buffer. We evaluate our approach using representative network topologies and a wide range of simulations. The results clearly show that the Buffer algorithm provisions efficiently the incoming traffic in the network. In addition, we show the reduction of request blocking for the highest priority traffic that cannot be interrupted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.542
Threshold uncertainty score0.856

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it