Experimental investigation of turbulent flow in a rotating straight channel with continuous ribs
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We experimentally study the combined effects of continuous ribs and rotations constructed in a square duct on the turbulent flows and flow separation. The ribs obstruct the channel by 10% of its height and are arranged in three different pitch-to-height ratios (P/e) of 10, 12, and 15. The Reynolds number (Re = ρU0D/μ) is fixed at 10 000, and the rotation number (Ro = ΩD/U0) varies from 0 to 0.52. A time-resolved particle image velocimetry system is applied to provide insights into the main flow and turbulence mechanism. Results show that rotation significantly changes main flow and turbulent characteristics. In particular, a main flow phenomenon has been found: on account of the secondary flow near the ribs, velocity profile deflects to the leading side under a low rotation number, and when Ro rises to 0.48 (critical value), velocity profile deflects to the trailing side. It gives an insight into main flow in a ribbed channel. Reattachment law has been investigated, which can optimize heat transfer by optimize rib arrangement. A proper orthogonal decomposition analysis is also considered to identify the spatial characteristics of the superimposed flow fields. Based on the experimental data, the existence of ribs with different P/e ratios and Coriolis forces play significant roles in rib-generated vortices as well as their turbulent activities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it