MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3013332732 · doi:10.33050/icit.v3i2.62

PENGEMBANGAN PROTOTIPE EXECUTIVE DASHBOARD PADA LEMBAGA PENGELOLA DANA CSR (CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY)

2017· article· id· W3013332732 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueICIT Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSMEs Development and Digital Marketing
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDashboardComputer scienceBusiness administrationBusinessDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pengembangan prototipe executive dashboard pada lembaga pengelola dana CSR merupakan penelitian yang dilakukan dalam rangka mengimplementasikan sebuah sistem executive dashboard yang dapat membantu manajemen lembaga pengelola dana CSR dalam mengambil keputusan. Penelitian ini dilakukan di CCSR (Cilegon Corporate Social Responsibility). Pada saat ini CCSR belum memiliki sistem dashboard. Pembangunan executive dashboard dibangun berdasarkan model pengembangan dashboard berbasis user centered design dengan menggunakan model prototipe berbasis OOAD (Object-oriented analysis and design). Prototipe diuji dengan menggunakan pengujian ISO 9126. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah sebuah prototipe executive dashboard arsip digital yang dapat dijadikan sebagai salah satu referensi pimpinan lembaga CSR dalam mengambil keputusan.
 
 Kata Kunci: CSR, CCSR, Dashboard, ISO 9126

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.313
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0100.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it