MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3013354539 · doi:10.1109/mmul.2020.2980098

Multimedia and the Tactile Internet

2020· article· en· W3013354539 on OpenAlexaff
Abdulmotaleb El Saddik

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Multimedia · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInteractive and Immersive Displays
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceLatency (audio)The InternetHuman–computer interactionPerceptionHaptic technologyVirtual realityMultisensory integrationMultimediaArtificial intelligenceWorld Wide WebTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the rapid development in the areas of multisensory hard- and software and the emergence of Tactile Internet, new media such as haptics, smell, olfaction, etc., nowadays, play a prominent role in making virtual objects physically tangible in a collaborative and/or networked virtual environment. By allowing users to feel each other's presence and physically manipulate objects from their interacted environments within 1 ms. The Tactile Internet facilitates fast multimodal interactions with multisensory information over the 5G network. 1 ms is a critical threshold in human perception of tactile response. For auditory response, this threshold is 100 ms and for visual response, it is 10 ms, which means delays above these thresholds are within the latency limit sensed by the human brain. In 4G, the round trip latency is 25 ms for an ideal environment. Clearly, that indicates 4G is not able to meet the requirements of tactile response. For this reason, the efforts to reduce latency in 5G are critical for Tactile Internet. Low-latency communications will also enable other digital twins’ applications such as real-time control of smart grid, self-driving car, and so on.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.076

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE MultimediaSame topicInteractive and Immersive DisplaysFrench-language works237,207