MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Exact Outage Analysis for Stochastic Cellular Networks under Multi-User MIMO

2020· article· en· W3013466417 on OpenAlexaff
Sachitha Kusaladharma, Wei‐Ping Zhu, Wessam Ajib

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBase stationPoisson point processStochastic geometryMIMOPrecodingComputer scienceRayleigh fadingTelecommunications linkPath lossMulti-user MIMOComputer networkStochastic geometry models of wireless networksFadingPoint processSignal-to-interference-plus-noise ratioCellular networkWirelessWireless networkChannel (broadcasting)TelecommunicationsRadio resource managementMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The next generations of cellular wireless systems promise an improved user experience with respect to the throughput, reliability, latency, and connectivity. To this end, multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) and massive MIMO systems hold enormous potential. Moreover, due to heterogeneity and densification, user and base station locations are increasingly random. Thus, in this paper, we characterize the performance of a typical downlink user within a massive MIMO Voronoi cell when the base stations employ matched filter based precoding in the downlink. We consider a typical Voronoi cell where the base stations follow a Poisson point process (PPP), and also consider the users to be randomly distributed according to a PPP independent from the base stations. Furthermore, a wireless channel with log-distance path loss and Rayleigh fading is assumed. Using a novel framework to model the signal to noise ratio, the outage probability of a user is derived in closed-form while taking into account full and partial loading for the cell's base station due to the randomness of user numbers. Numerical results show that the outage probability is heavily dependent on the base station density, and that the performance decreases when the maximum number of users served by a base station increases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207