MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Exact Outage Analysis for Stochastic Cellular Networks under Multi-User MIMO

2020· article· en· W3013466417 on OpenAlexaff
Sachitha Kusaladharma, Wei‐Ping Zhu, Wessam Ajib

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBase stationPoisson point processStochastic geometryMIMOPrecodingComputer scienceRayleigh fadingTelecommunications linkPath lossMulti-user MIMOComputer networkStochastic geometry models of wireless networksFadingPoint processSignal-to-interference-plus-noise ratioCellular networkWirelessWireless networkChannel (broadcasting)TelecommunicationsRadio resource managementMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The next generations of cellular wireless systems promise an improved user experience with respect to the throughput, reliability, latency, and connectivity. To this end, multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) and massive MIMO systems hold enormous potential. Moreover, due to heterogeneity and densification, user and base station locations are increasingly random. Thus, in this paper, we characterize the performance of a typical downlink user within a massive MIMO Voronoi cell when the base stations employ matched filter based precoding in the downlink. We consider a typical Voronoi cell where the base stations follow a Poisson point process (PPP), and also consider the users to be randomly distributed according to a PPP independent from the base stations. Furthermore, a wireless channel with log-distance path loss and Rayleigh fading is assumed. Using a novel framework to model the signal to noise ratio, the outage probability of a user is derived in closed-form while taking into account full and partial loading for the cell's base station due to the randomness of user numbers. Numerical results show that the outage probability is heavily dependent on the base station density, and that the performance decreases when the maximum number of users served by a base station increases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.950
Threshold uncertainty score0.634

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207