Slaughter performance, chemical composition and physical technological parameters of Holstein veal fed with total mixed ration (TMR) and alfalfa hay
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Article Details: Received: 2020-01-07 | Accepted: 2020-01-24 | Available online: 2020-03-31 https://doi.org/10.15414/afz.2020.23.01.29-36 This study was conducted to evaluate the selected fattening characteristics, carcass parameters and analysing of parameters associated with the meat quality of twenty Holstein male calves fed with different diets. Calves were after weaning divided into two groups with respect of feeding; control group fed with untreated total mixed ration (TMR) and experimental group, which received industrially dried alfalfa hay. Calves of both groups were after about 193 days slaughtered in the experimental abattoir. Subsequently, after chilling for 24 hours, detailed dissection of the right â carcass half was performed. For the nutritional characteristics, physical technological parameters and sensory properties, slices of loin ( M. longissimus thoracis ) and top round ( M. semimembranosus ) muscles were taken 24 hours post mortem . The average daily gains were higher in the experimental group of calves ( P >0.05). Although calves of the control group had higher dressing percentage (50.23%; P >0.05), no significant differences were determined in the carcass weight ( P >0.05). Proportions of some of intraabdominal fats were influenced by feeding concept; calves of alfalfa hay treated group had lower proportion of intestinal fat ( P >0.05) and higher proportion of kidney fat ( P >0.05). Differences in total amount of meat from right â half carcass were not significant ( P >0.05); proportion of separable fat was higher in the experimental group of calves. In terms of individual valuable meat cuts, higher proportion of tenderloin was determined in the group fed with alfalfa hay (1.80%); however results were no significant. Statistical significant variety at the level P <0.05 were revealed in the moisture content, intramuscular fat content and energy value. The loin muscle from experimental group was lighter (CIE L *; P >0.05) 24 hours post mortem . Keywords: different diet, veal quality parameters, bull calves, meat colour, right â half carcass References BartoÅ, L. et al. (2003). Growth, feed efficiency and carcass characteristics of Czech Pied and Holstein bulls. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 48(11), pp. 459â465. Biel, W. et al. (2019). Offal Chemical Composition from Veal, Beef, and Lamb Maintained in Organic Production Systems. Animals, 9(8), pp. 489. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9080489 Brewer , S. (2010). Handbook of Meat Processing. Ames: Blackwell Publishing, p. 584. Campbell , C. P. et al. (2013). Packing plant differences in meat quality for grain-fed veal. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 93(2), 205â215. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas2012-147 Dias, A. M. O. et al. (2018) Performance and fatty acid profile of Holstein calves slaughtered at different weights. R. Bras. Zootec., 47. https://doi.org/10.1590/rbz4720170208 Domaradzki , P. et al. (2017). Slaughter value and meat quality of suckler calves: A review. Meat Science, 134, 135â149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.07.026 Drake , N. A. (2017). The performance of veal calves fed concentrate, total mixed ration, or free choice in the post-weaning period: Master of Sustainable Animal Nutrition and Feeding Thesis. Aarhaus: Aarhus University. EC (2008). Council Regulation (EC) No. 361/2008 of 14 April 2008 amending Regulation (EC) No. 1234/2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products. Feiner, G. (2006). Meat products handbook: Practical science and technology. London: Woodhead Publishing Limited and CRC Press. Foltys , V. and Mojto , J. (2009). Produkty hovädzieho dobytka a ich kvalita. [Online]. Retrieved 2019-01-15 from http://old.agroporadenstvo.sk/zv/hd/chovhd10.htm?start Gariépy , C. et al. (1998). Effect of calf feeding regimes and diet EDTA on physico-chemical characteristics of veal stored under modified atmospheres. Meat Science, 49(1), 101â115. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(97)00115-0 Gálvez , F. et al. (2019). Nutritional and meat quality characteristics of seven primal cuts from 9âmonthâold female veal calves: a preliminary study. J Sci Food Agric, 99, 2947â2956. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.9508 González, L. et al. (2014). Effect of supplementing different oils: Linseed, sunflower and soybean, on animal performance, carcass characteristics, meat quality and fatty acid profile of veal from âRubia gallegaâ calves. Meat Science: Part A, 96(2), 829â 836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.09.027 HUFF-LONERGAN, E. (2010). Chemistry and Biochemistry of Meat. In TOLDRÃ, F. (2010) Handbook of Meat Processing. 1st ed., Blackwell Publishing. 2121 State Avenue, Ames, Iowa 50014-8300, USA, 2010, pp. 584. ISBN 978-0-8138-2182-5. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780813820897 Holló, G. et al. (2013). Characterisation of carcass composition and meat quality of male suckling buffalo calves kept on natural grassland. Archives Animal Breeding, 56(1), 1060â1065. https://doi.org/10.7482/0003-9438-56-107 Cho, S. et al. (2014). Physico-chemical Meat Qualities of Loin and Top Round Beef from Holstein Calves with Different Slaughtering Ages. Korean Journal for Food Science of Animal Resources, 34(5), 674â682. http://dx.doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2014.34.5.674 Irshad, A. et al. (2013). Factors influencing carcass composition of livestock: a review. Journal of Animal Production Advances, 3(5), 177â186. https://doi.org/10.5455/japa.20130531093231 Klont , R. E. et al. (2000). Effects of rate of pH fall, time of deboning, aging period, and their interaction on veal quality characteristics. Journal of Animal Science, 78(7), 1845â1851. https://doi.org/10.2527/2000.7871845x Lengyel , Z. et al. (2003). Fatty acid composition of intramuscular lipids in various muscles of Holstein-Friesian bulls slaughtered at different agens. Meat Science, 65(1), 593â598. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00252-8 Maciel , R. P. (2016). Performance, rumen development, and carcass traits of male calves fed starter concentrate with crude glycerin. R. Bras. Zootec., 45(6), 309â318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-92902016000600005 Mojto , J. et al. (2009). Effect of age at slaughter on quality of carcass and meat in cows. Slovak Journal of Animal Science, 42(1), 34 â 37. Moran , J. B. et al. (1992). Growth, carcass and meat quality in veal calves fed diets based on wholemilk or milk replacers. Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod., 17, 254â257. Moran , J. B. and Currie, J. R. (1992). The distribution of meat in pink veal carcasses as influenced by carcass weight, breed and diet. Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod., 19, 65â67. Moreno, T. et al. (2006). Nutritional characteristics of veal from weaned and unweaned calves: Discriminatory ability of the fat profile. Meat Science, 73(2), 209â217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.11.016 Ngapo, T. M. and Gariépy , C. (2006). Factors affecting the meat quality of veal: Review. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 86, 1412â1431. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2507 Noon, C. D. et al. (1998). The use of corn and barley in diets for veal calves: Effects on performance, diet digestibility and carcass quality. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 78(3), 351â358. https://doi.org/10.4141/A97-100 Pateiro , M. et al. (2013). Meat quality of veal: Discriminatory ability of weaning status. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 11(4), 1044â1056. http://dx.doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2013114-4363 Ripoll, G. et al. (2013). Instrumental meat quality of veal calves reared under three management systems and color evolution of meat stored in three packaging systems. Meat Science, 93(2), 336â343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.09.012 Santos , P.V. et al. (2013). Carcass physical composition and meat quality of Holstein calves, terminated in different finishing systems and slaughter weights. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, 37(5), 1413â7054. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542013000500008 SAS INSTITUTE Inc. (2011). Base SAS® 9.3 Procedures Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., Carry. Schaefer, D. M. (2007). Yield and Quality of Holstein Beef [Online]. Retrieved 2019-12-02 from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/90ea/1591cfbbaed6a756e6d9c483ff48cb3f6802.pdf SkÅivanová, E. et al. (2007). Influence of dietary selenium and vitamin E on quality of veal. Meat Science, 76(3), 495â500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.01.003 Titi, H. H. et al. (2008). Growth and carcass characteristics of male dairy calves on a yeast culture-supplemented diet. South African Journal of Animal Science, 38(3), 174â183. http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v38i3.4125 Vieira , C. et al. (2005). Effect of diet composition and slaughter weight on animal performance, carcass and meat quality, and fatty acid composition in veal calves. Livestock Production Science, 93(3), 263â275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2004.11.020 Williams , P. (2007). Nutritional composition of red meat. Nutrition & Dietetics, 64(4), S113âS119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-0080.2007.00197.x Williams , J. L. (2008). Genetic control of meat quality traits. In Toldrá, F. (2008) Meat Biotechnology. New York: Springer Science-Business-Media, 21â60. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79382-5 Yim , D.G. et al. (2015a). Meat quality of Loin and Top Round Muscles from the Hanwoo and Holstein Veal Calves. Korean Journal for Food Science of Animal Resources, 35(6), 731â737. http://dx.doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2015.35.6.731 Yim , D. G. et al. (2015b). Physicochemical traits of Holstein loin and top round veal from two slaughter age groups. Journal of Animal Science and Technology, 57(24), 1â5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40781-015-0058-0 Â
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".