MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3013513816 · doi:10.2118/0420-0008-jpt

Comments: SPE’s Response to COVID-19

2020· article· en· W3013513816 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mark Rubin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Petroleum Technology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLibrary scienceExhibitionEvent (particle physics)Government (linguistics)Operations researchEngineeringPolitical scienceHistoryComputer scienceArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Note: The situation with the spread of the virus and government and company responses to it is very fluid. To meet press deadlines for JPT, this piece was written in mid-March. As the situation evolves, SPE will update this note at www.spe.org and individual event or other activity websites with the latest information. Networking is core to SPE activities, whether through an event, a local section meeting, service on a committee or other activity. The rapid spread of the COVID-19 virus globally is having far-reaching impacts across SPE activities. SPE has acted quickly, first in Asia Pacific, then elsewhere, to avoid increasing potential member and staff exposure. To date, SPE has postponed a number of conferences and most workshops including the following (see event websites for more details). OTC Asia, Kuala Lumpur Oman Petroleum & Energy Show, Muscat International HSE Conference, Bogota Latin America and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Bogota Canada Heavy Oil Conference, Calgary Canada Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary Norway Subsurface Conference, Bergen Offshore Technology Conference, Houston By the time you are reading this, it is very likely that more events will have been postponed. By postponing, rather than canceling these events, we ensure that the significant work of program committees and authors to prepare for these events covering important technical topics will not have been wasted. In a few cases, it may be necessary to cancel an event. Thus far, this includes only the SPE/ICoTA Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition, The Woodlands, Texas. Canceled events are most likely annual events and postponing by a few months would harm the next edition of the event. We are actively investigating options to allow those presenting papers at these events to do so in a digital format to share the content. In determining whether to postpone an event, SPE is taking into consideration the following factors: Conditions in the location where the event is to be held Mix of local and international participation expected at the event Guidance from key companies for the event about employee travel and participation Most of the Distinguished Lecturer (DL) tours for March and April have been canceled either due to the situation in the region to be visited or company travel restrictions. We are exploring virtual and digital options for the DL program. SPE has pro-vided some guidance to sections on their decision-making regarding local events, recognizing these are decisions best made at the local level. SPE will use criteria similar to those above in determining how to proceed with activities such as Regional Officers Meetings, Student Paper Contests, and PetroBowl Regional Qualifiers. We are seeking ways to enable remote participation in as many activities as feasible. Our emphasis in all cases is on local conditions and the health and safety of participants. SPE will continue actively monitoring the situation and potential impacts on future activities. The health and safety of our members, attendees, and staff is our highest priority, and that will guide any decisions that we make.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.055
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.153
Threshold uncertainty score0.511

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.055
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0170.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1530.074

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Petroleum TechnologySame topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207