Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery for <scp>HPV</scp>‐associated locoregionally advanced oropharynx cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery (NAC + S), a paradigm based on systemic escalation coupled with surgery-based de-escalation, is under investigation for treatment of HPV-associated oropharynx cancer (OPC). METHODS: Prospective cohort of patients with non-metastatic, p16 positive OPC enrolled in a clinical trial of NAC + S was compared to a historic cohort of patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) to compare disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were treated with NAC + S and 142 with CCRT. Stage-matched patients undergoing CCRT had higher frequency of smoking and alcohol consumption. 5-year DFS in the NAC + S group was 96.1% (95% CI 90.8-100) compared to 67.6% (95% CI 50.7-84.5) for CCRT (P = .01). At 12 months from treatment, 24.5% of patients undergoing CCRT and none of the patients in the NAC + S were feeding tube dependent (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: NAC + S may be a novel approach for HPV-associated OPC as it provides lower feeding tube dependence and improved survival compared to stage-matched patients undergoing CCRT.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".