MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Dyonic and magnetized black holes based on nonlinear electrodynamics

2020· article· en· W3013607929 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe European Physical Journal C · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlack hole (networking)SingularityCoulombHelmholtz free energyUnitarityMagnetic potentialLimit (mathematics)Magnetic monopoleCharge (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We propose a new model of nonlinear electrodynamics with two dimensional parameters. The phenomenon of vacuum birefringence, the principles of causality and unitarity were studied. It was shown that there is no a singularity of the electric field in the center of point-like charges. Corrections to the Coulomb law as $$r\rightarrow \infty $$ r→∞ were obtained. Dyonic and magnetized black holes are considered. We show that in the self-dual case, when the electric charge equals the magnetic charge, corrections to Coulomb’s law and Reissner–Nordström solutions are absent. The metric function and its asymptotic limit as $$r\rightarrow \infty $$ r→∞ for magnetic black holes were evaluated. We calculate the magnetic mass of the black hole, which is finite. The thermodynamic properties and thermal stability of black holes were investigated. We calculated the Hawking temperature, the heat capacity and the Helmholtz free energy of black holes and showed that for some parameter values there are second-order phase transitions. It was demonstrated that at some range of the parameters the black holes are stable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe European Physical Journal CSame topicBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsFrench-language works237,207