한국에 온 서양 여성선교사들(1886년~1955년)의 삶과 사역에 관한 고찰 -미북장로교회, 호주장로교회, 미남장로교회와 캐나다장로교회를 중심으로
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Presbyterian Church America, the Australian Presbyterian Church, the Presbyterian Church (USA) and the Presbyterian Church in Canada are the root of the Presbyterian Church in Korea. To understand Western women missionaries begin at the root of Korean Christianity, The numbers of Western women missionaries reached60% during the early Protestant mission in Korea, The work of Western women missionaries has had an effect on religion, education, culture and society and history in Korea as they are evangelists, educators, medical workers, social workers, translators, Bible teachers, etc. Western women missionaries have contributed to the elevation of the status of women and gender equality, and have shed new light on Korean women and children who were excluded from society and human rights at that time. The difficulties of Western women missionaries included conflict with men missionaries, misunderstanding among other missionaries, loneliness, lack of sanitary facilities, loss of children to disease, bias against women, different lifestyles between Korean and women missionaries, uncomfortable transportation and means of communication, and heavy workloads. Korean women missionaries have been challenged and encouraged by Western women missionaries. Western women missionaries have been good examples to Korean women missionaries who serve the Lord in foreign countries. Today Korean Churches are recognized in the world, it could possible, because of the contributions of Western women missionaries as well as Western men missionaries in Korea. Now the Korean church should keep the Western woman missionary`s precious heritage and should discharge our debt of love to world mission.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.051 | 0.015 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".