MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3013675492 · doi:10.1016/j.sxmr.2020.02.002

“The Overactive Pelvic Floor (OPF) and Sexual Dysfunction” Part 1: Pathophysiology of OPF and Its Impact on the Sexual Response

2020· review· en· W3013675492 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSexual Medicine Reviews · 2020
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPelvic floor disorders treatments
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de SherbrookeUniversité de SherbrookeUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSexual dysfunctionDistressPremature ejaculationPsychosocialSexual functionErectile dysfunctionMedicineOrgasmSexual desireSexual arousalPelvic floorBiopsychosocial modelEtiologyPelvic painPathophysiologyPsychologyClinical psychologyHuman sexualityPsychiatrySexual behaviorInternal medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Overactive pelvic floor (OPF) muscles are defined as muscles that do not relax, or may even contract, when relaxation is needed, for example, during micturition or defecation. Conditions associated with OPF are multifactorial and include multiple possible etiologies and symptom complexes. The complex interplay between biological and psychosocial elements can lead to the persistence of OPF symptoms along with psychological and emotional distress. OBJECTIVES: (1) To review and contextualize, from a pathophysiologic perspective, the evidence for OPF, (2) to provide an overview of common clinical presentations and comorbidities of OPF, and (3) to discuss the effect of OPF on sexual function in men and women. METHODS: Review of the updated literature on the pathophysiology of OPF was carried out. OPF-associated conditions were overviewed, with special emphasis on the impact on sexual function in men and women. RESULTS: Individuals with suspected OPF often present with a combination of gastrointestinal, gynecological, musculoskeletal, sexual, and urological comorbidities, mostly accompanied by psychoemotional distress. In both women and men, sexual function is significantly impaired by OPF and genitopelvic pain penetration disorders are often the primary manifestation of this condition. Women with OPF report less sexual desire, arousal, and satisfaction; more difficulty reaching orgasm; lower frequencies of intercourse; more negative attitudes toward sexuality; and more sexual distress than women without sexual pain. The most frequently reported sexual dysfunctions in men with OPF include erectile dysfunction, premature ejaculation, and ejaculatory pain. CONCLUSION: The complex pathophysiology of OPF involving multisystemic comorbidities and psychosocial factors emphasize the importance of a biopsychosocial assessment for guiding effective and personalized management. Padoa A, McLean L, Morin M, et al. "The Overactive Pelvic Floor (OPF) and Sexual Dysfunction" Part 1: Pathophysiology of OPF and Its Impact on the Sexual Response. Sex Med 2021;9:64-75.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it