MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Role of Combination Antiplatelet and Anticoagulation Therapy in Diabetes Mellitus and Cardiovascular Disease

2020· article· en· W3013682615 on OpenAlexaff
Deepak L. Bhatt, John W. Eikelboom, Stuart J. Connolly, Philippe Gabríel Steg, Sonia S. Anand, Subodh Verma, Kelley R. Branch, Jeffrey L. Probstfield, Jackie Bosch, Olga Shestakovska, Michael Szarek, Aldo P. Maggioni, Petr Widimský, Álvaro Avezum, Rafael Díaz, Basil S. Lewis, Scott D. Berkowitz, Keith A.A. Fox, Lars Rydén, Salim Yusuf, Victor Aboyans, Marco Alings, Patrick Commerford, Nancy Cook‐Bruns, Gilles R. Dagenais, Antonio Dans, Georg Ertl, Camilo Félix, Tomasz J. Guzik, Randy Hart, Masatsugu Hori, A. K. Kakkar, Katalin Keltai, Mátyás Keltai, J. Kim, André Lamy, Fernando Laņas, Yan Liang, L. Liu, Eva Lonn, Patricio López‐Jaramillo, Kaj Metsärinne, Paul Moayyedi, Martin O’Donnell, Alexander Parkhomenko, Leopoldo Soares Piegas, Nana Pogosova, Mukul Sharma, Andrew M. Tonkin, Christian Torp‐Pedersen, George Varigos, Peter Verhamme, Dragoş Vinereanu, Khalid Yusoff, Jun Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's HospitalMcMaster UniversityPopulation Health Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDiabetes mellitusAspirinInternal medicineHazard ratioMyocardial infarctionStroke (engine)Coronary artery diseaseRivaroxabanClinical endpointPlaceboCardiologySurgeryWarfarinRandomized controlled trialAtrial fibrillationConfidence intervalEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Patients with established coronary artery disease or peripheral artery disease often have diabetes mellitus. These patients are at high risk of future vascular events. Methods: In a prespecified analysis of the COMPASS trial (Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies), we compared the effects of rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) plus aspirin (100 mg daily) versus placebo plus aspirin in patients with diabetes mellitus versus without diabetes mellitus in preventing major vascular events. The primary efficacy end point was the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Secondary end points included all-cause mortality and all major vascular events (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or major adverse limb events, including amputation). The primary safety end point was a modification of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria for major bleeding. Results: There were 10 341 patients with diabetes mellitus and 17 054 without diabetes mellitus in the overall trial. A consistent and similar relative risk reduction was seen for benefit of rivaroxaban plus aspirin (n=9152) versus placebo plus aspirin (n=9126) in patients both with (n=6922) and without (n=11 356) diabetes mellitus for the primary efficacy end point (hazard ratio, 0.74, P =0.002; and hazard ratio, 0.77, P =0.005, respectively, P interaction =0.77) and all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.81, P =0.05; and hazard ratio, 0.84, P =0.09, respectively; P interaction =0.82). However, although the absolute risk reductions appeared numerically larger in patients with versus without diabetes mellitus, both subgroups derived similar benefit (2.3% versus 1.4% for the primary efficacy end point at 3 years, Gail-Simon qualitative P interaction <0.0001; 1.9% versus 0.6% for all-cause mortality, P interaction =0.02; 2.7% versus 1.7% for major vascular events, P interaction <0.0001). Because the bleeding hazards were similar among patients with and without diabetes mellitus, the prespecified net benefit for rivaroxaban appeared particularly favorable in the patients with diabetes mellitus (2.7% versus 1.0%; Gail-Simon qualitative P interaction =0.001). Conclusions: In stable atherosclerosis, the combination of aspirin plus rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily provided a similar relative degree of benefit on coronary, cerebrovascular, and peripheral end points in patients with and without diabetes mellitus. Given their higher baseline risk, the absolute benefits appeared larger in those with diabetes mellitus, including a 3-fold greater reduction in all-cause mortality. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01776424.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.253

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations155
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207