MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3013701988 · doi:10.1109/lwc.2020.2982641

VLI: Variable-Length Identifier for Interconnecting Heterogeneous IoT Networks

2020· article· en· W3013701988 on OpenAlexaff
Gang Liu, Wei Quan, Nan Cheng, Hongke Zhang, Xuemin Shen

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Wireless Communications Letters · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNational Key Research and Development Program of China
KeywordsIdentifierHeaderComputer scienceIPv6Computer networkNetwork packetUnique identifierAddress spaceDistributed computingThe InternetOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Long identifier brings low packet forwarding efficiency in Internet of Things (IoT), whereas short identifier may suffer from the exhaustion of identifier space. Compared with fixed-length identifiers (e.g., IPv4 and IPv6), flexible identifiers are expected for balancing the packet processing efficiency with the various IoT scales. However, it is challenging to make IoT support the flexible identifier-based forwarding. In this letter, we firstly proposed a novel variable-length identifier (VLI) solution for interconnecting IoT networks. In particular, a VLI datagram header is designed to effectively support a flexible identifier field. Following a basic VLI header, one (multiple) extension header(s) can be added if require. Each extension header includes a fixed-size identifier field. According to the combination of multiple identifier fields, the variable-length identifier can be easily achieved, resolved and supported by the IoT nodes in a flexible way. Experimental results show that VLI can decrease the processing delay effectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Wireless Communications LettersSame topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207