MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3013701988 · doi:10.1109/lwc.2020.2982641

VLI: Variable-Length Identifier for Interconnecting Heterogeneous IoT Networks

2020· article· en· W3013701988 on OpenAlexaff
Gang Liu, Wei Quan, Nan Cheng, Hongke Zhang, Xuemin Shen

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Wireless Communications Letters · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNational Key Research and Development Program of China
KeywordsIdentifierHeaderComputer scienceIPv6Computer networkNetwork packetUnique identifierAddress spaceDistributed computingThe InternetOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Long identifier brings low packet forwarding efficiency in Internet of Things (IoT), whereas short identifier may suffer from the exhaustion of identifier space. Compared with fixed-length identifiers (e.g., IPv4 and IPv6), flexible identifiers are expected for balancing the packet processing efficiency with the various IoT scales. However, it is challenging to make IoT support the flexible identifier-based forwarding. In this letter, we firstly proposed a novel variable-length identifier (VLI) solution for interconnecting IoT networks. In particular, a VLI datagram header is designed to effectively support a flexible identifier field. Following a basic VLI header, one (multiple) extension header(s) can be added if require. Each extension header includes a fixed-size identifier field. According to the combination of multiple identifier fields, the variable-length identifier can be easily achieved, resolved and supported by the IoT nodes in a flexible way. Experimental results show that VLI can decrease the processing delay effectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.852
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Wireless Communications LettersSame topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207