MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3013711738 · doi:10.1109/eic43217.2019.9046622

Temperature and Electric Field under Pulse Voltage along the Stress Grading System of a Form-Wound Coil

2019· article· en· W3013711738 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrostatic Discharge in Electronics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectric fieldNonlinear systemElectromagnetic coilVoltageConductivityElectrical resistivity and conductivityMaterials scienceElectrical engineeringNuclear magnetic resonancePhysicsMechanicsEngineeringQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Simulation studies under pulse voltage using a 2D axisymmetric model in COMSOL <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">®</sup> 5.3a on the temperature and electric field along the stress grading system (SGS) of a form wound coil are reported in this work. The validity of the 2D model is shown by comparing the results with the measured temperature profile along the SGS. The effect of the nonlinearity of stress grading tape (SGT) conductivity is evaluated on both temperature and electric field. The results show that increasing the level of the nonlinearity of the SGT conductivity reduces the maximum electric field. On the other hand, the temperature rise is decreased by reducing the level of the nonlinearity of the SGT conductivity. As such, the effect of nonlinearity changes are not mutually compatible in controlling both the electric field and temperature profiles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.190
Threshold uncertainty score0.502

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectrostatic Discharge in ElectronicsFrench-language works237,207