La marmite de Cox-Lomagne au XVIIIe siècle : contenant et contenu
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les recherches menées depuis plus de vingt ans sur les sites de production toulousains et le développement de l’archéologie moderne ont bénéficié ces dernières années du renouvellement de l’étude des artefacts céramiques retrouvés sur des sites canadiens. Une céramique est particulièrement concernée par les exportations en Nouvelle-France de la fin du XVIIe siècle à la première moitié du XVIIIe siècle : la marmite dite «de Cox » . Si l’origine de cet objet est désormais acquise grâce aux comparaisons morphologiques et aux analyses archéométriques, sa fonction est remise en question par les découvertes actuelles. Plus qu’un objet servant à la cuisson des aliments, nous sommes plus sûrement en présence d’un contenant pour un produit promis à un grand avenir pour la gastronomie du Sud-Ouest : la cuisse d’oie confite. Cette nouvelle hypothèse archéologique renouvelle la connaissance de son contenu et par là-même des sociétés rurales qui l’ont produite et exportée.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".