MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3013804796 · doi:10.1136/ebnurs-2019-103243

Complex interactions between provider, organisation and patient level characteristics influence the effect of pressure ulcer preventive care interventions

2020· letter· en· W3013804796 on OpenAlexaff
Rossana Urrutia-Bastardo, Tanvir Chowdhury Turin

Bibliographic record

VenueEvidence-Based Nursing · 2020
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePsychological interventionPressure injuryIntensive care medicineBlood pressurePreventive careEmergency medicineHealth careInternal medicineNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Commentary on: Baernholdt M, Yan G, Hinton ID, et al . Effect of preventive care interventions on pressure ulcer rates in a national sample of rural and urban nursing units: longitudinal associations over 4 years. Int J Nurs Stud 2019:103455. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103455 Pressure ulcers develop due to persisting pressure on a bony site leading to obstruction of the blood flow in healthy capillaries resulting in tissue injury.1 These commonly occur in patients with limited mobility such as those in hospitals or long-term care settings.1 2 The key components in preventing pressure ulcers are early and accurate identification of at-risk …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.920
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEvidence-Based NursingSame topicPressure Ulcer Prevention and ManagementFrench-language works237,207