MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3013809427 · doi:10.1353/tj.2020.0025

Robert Lepage’s Scenographic Dramaturgy: The Aesthetic Signature at Work by Melissa Poll

2020· article· en· W3013809427 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTheatre Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheatre and Performance Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDramaturgyVisual artsTrilogyPerformance artArtArt historyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Robert Lepage’s Scenographic Dramaturgy: The Aesthetic Signature at Work by Melissa Poll Natalie Rewa ROBERT LEPAGE’S SCENOGRAPHIC DRAMATURGY: THE AESTHETIC SIGNATURE AT WORK. By Melissa Poll. Adaptation in Theatre and Performance series. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018; pp. 200. Melissa Poll addresses the work of Québécois theatre artist Robert Lepage from the refreshing angle of scenographic dramaturgy—the use of scenic elements as dramaturgical form—as an approach to adaptation. Lepage’s devising method combines the “RSVP cycles” developed by architect Lawrence Halprin and dancer Anna Halprin with Alain Knapp’s techniques for drawing out actorly creativity. The result is a dynamic model for performance creation that emphasizes material resources and artistic collaboration. From his own early solo shows and the collectively devised epics Dragon’s Trilogy (1980s) and Seven Streams of the River Ota (1990s), Lepage has concurrently been probing traditions of theatrical, operatic, choreographic, and circus performance on international stages. When in 1994 he and his collaborators in Quebec City founded the theatre company Ex Machina, they also established the studio-cum-laboratory la Caserne, named after the building’s original function as a fire hall. In the fall of 2019, Ex Machina, under Lepage’s artistic direction, inaugurated Le Diamant, a new performance hub in a former YMCA building in downtown Quebec City, to feature local, national, and international artists. Given Lepage’s collaborations in these settings and in the United States, Europe, Japan, and elsewhere, Poll’s study of his approach to adaptation is particularly timely. The “aesthetic signature” of Poll’s subtitle refers to the energy inherent in Lepage’s devised creations. Focusing on Lepage’s treatment of existing and often problematic texts, with a critical eye trained on his artistic partnerships, Poll identifies a hybrid approach that combines modernist directorial presence with the collaborative deployment of scenographic technologies. Using a handful of landmark productions, [End Page 122] she argues, in short, that Lepage’s use of scenographic elements as dramaturgical resources in his adaptations yields a postdramatic methodology that extends to the entire “visual and physical world of a production” (3). Lepage’s multidisciplinarity allows him to adopt French director Pascal Ram-bert’s expanded definition of “ecriture scènique” to include methodologies, technologies, and bodies in the creation process (36). In making her argument, Poll demonstrates the usefulness of centering both collaborative negotiation and dramaturgical historicity in the study of scenography. Her study is productively organized using a three-part framework. First, Poll considers the temporal aspects of Lepage’s scenography. In the immediacy of performance, she argues, scenic elements may be read as the “kinetic text of the collaborators,” as much an onstage agent as the actors themselves (3). Inevitably, this frame brings the contributions of specific collaborators to the forefront of Poll’s analysis. She considers, for example, Lepage’s ongoing collaborations with set designer Carl Filion on the computer-operated machinery that dominated the Ring Cycle at the Metropolitan Opera. In each of her case studies, Poll is mindful of the accusations leveled at Lepage that his works coopt cultural forms. Against this perception, she characterizes his engagement with other cultures as a “productive interculturalism [that] is beginning to unfold below the performative surface through Lepage’s adaptation process” (187). In The Tempest, created with the Huron Wendat Nation for Montreal’s outdoor Wendake Theatre, Poll reveals how cultural hybridity in casting, scenography, and choreography subverted discourses of authenticity. In Lepage’s production of Igor Stravinsky’s The Nightingale and Other Stories, she shows how Mara Gotler’s costume designs combined with puppet artist Michael Curry’s Vietnamese water puppets and athletic shadow puppetry (developed on a research trip with Lepage to Vietnam) to create a “Chinoiserie by design” (63–73). Poll also nimbly puts into perspective Lepage’s adaptations of his own earlier work. For The Blue Dragon, his 2010 working of The Dragon’s Trilogy (1985/2003), Lepage used dancer Tai Wei Foo’s choreography to evoke the multiplicities of Shanghai’s past and present. When Lepage later commissioned illustrator Fred Jourdain to create a graphic novel of the work, their aim was to use the illustrator’s visual resources to interrogate...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.654
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it