MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3013809427 · doi:10.1353/tj.2020.0025

Robert Lepage’s Scenographic Dramaturgy: The Aesthetic Signature at Work by Melissa Poll

2020· article· en· W3013809427 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueTheatre Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueTheatre and Performance Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDramaturgyVisual artsTrilogyPerformance artArtArt historyHistory

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Robert Lepage’s Scenographic Dramaturgy: The Aesthetic Signature at Work by Melissa Poll Natalie Rewa ROBERT LEPAGE’S SCENOGRAPHIC DRAMATURGY: THE AESTHETIC SIGNATURE AT WORK. By Melissa Poll. Adaptation in Theatre and Performance series. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018; pp. 200. Melissa Poll addresses the work of Québécois theatre artist Robert Lepage from the refreshing angle of scenographic dramaturgy—the use of scenic elements as dramaturgical form—as an approach to adaptation. Lepage’s devising method combines the “RSVP cycles” developed by architect Lawrence Halprin and dancer Anna Halprin with Alain Knapp’s techniques for drawing out actorly creativity. The result is a dynamic model for performance creation that emphasizes material resources and artistic collaboration. From his own early solo shows and the collectively devised epics Dragon’s Trilogy (1980s) and Seven Streams of the River Ota (1990s), Lepage has concurrently been probing traditions of theatrical, operatic, choreographic, and circus performance on international stages. When in 1994 he and his collaborators in Quebec City founded the theatre company Ex Machina, they also established the studio-cum-laboratory la Caserne, named after the building’s original function as a fire hall. In the fall of 2019, Ex Machina, under Lepage’s artistic direction, inaugurated Le Diamant, a new performance hub in a former YMCA building in downtown Quebec City, to feature local, national, and international artists. Given Lepage’s collaborations in these settings and in the United States, Europe, Japan, and elsewhere, Poll’s study of his approach to adaptation is particularly timely. The “aesthetic signature” of Poll’s subtitle refers to the energy inherent in Lepage’s devised creations. Focusing on Lepage’s treatment of existing and often problematic texts, with a critical eye trained on his artistic partnerships, Poll identifies a hybrid approach that combines modernist directorial presence with the collaborative deployment of scenographic technologies. Using a handful of landmark productions, [End Page 122] she argues, in short, that Lepage’s use of scenographic elements as dramaturgical resources in his adaptations yields a postdramatic methodology that extends to the entire “visual and physical world of a production” (3). Lepage’s multidisciplinarity allows him to adopt French director Pascal Ram-bert’s expanded definition of “ecriture scènique” to include methodologies, technologies, and bodies in the creation process (36). In making her argument, Poll demonstrates the usefulness of centering both collaborative negotiation and dramaturgical historicity in the study of scenography. Her study is productively organized using a three-part framework. First, Poll considers the temporal aspects of Lepage’s scenography. In the immediacy of performance, she argues, scenic elements may be read as the “kinetic text of the collaborators,” as much an onstage agent as the actors themselves (3). Inevitably, this frame brings the contributions of specific collaborators to the forefront of Poll’s analysis. She considers, for example, Lepage’s ongoing collaborations with set designer Carl Filion on the computer-operated machinery that dominated the Ring Cycle at the Metropolitan Opera. In each of her case studies, Poll is mindful of the accusations leveled at Lepage that his works coopt cultural forms. Against this perception, she characterizes his engagement with other cultures as a “productive interculturalism [that] is beginning to unfold below the performative surface through Lepage’s adaptation process” (187). In The Tempest, created with the Huron Wendat Nation for Montreal’s outdoor Wendake Theatre, Poll reveals how cultural hybridity in casting, scenography, and choreography subverted discourses of authenticity. In Lepage’s production of Igor Stravinsky’s The Nightingale and Other Stories, she shows how Mara Gotler’s costume designs combined with puppet artist Michael Curry’s Vietnamese water puppets and athletic shadow puppetry (developed on a research trip with Lepage to Vietnam) to create a “Chinoiserie by design” (63–73). Poll also nimbly puts into perspective Lepage’s adaptations of his own earlier work. For The Blue Dragon, his 2010 working of The Dragon’s Trilogy (1985/2003), Lepage used dancer Tai Wei Foo’s choreography to evoke the multiplicities of Shanghai’s past and present. When Lepage later commissioned illustrator Fred Jourdain to create a graphic novel of the work, their aim was to use the illustrator’s visual resources to interrogate...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,654
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,196
Écart entre enseignants0,183 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle