MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3013812799 · doi:10.1201/9780429281952-15

Pinus Ponderosa Needle-Induced Toxicity

2020· book-chapter· en· W3013812799 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
S. P. Ford, John P. N. Rosazza, R. E. Short

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and fungal interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPinus <genus>ToxicityEnvironmental scienceForestryBiologyChemistryBotanyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pinus ponderosa or western yellow pine (Pinaceae) is widely distributed in the US, but is most abundant in the western US and western Canada. It was suggested by L. R. James et al. that in addition to the possible toxins in Pinus ponderosa needles, several other factors may be associated with and/or predispose animals to abort following their consumption. These include: stage of gestation when agent(s) are ingested, environmental stresses, condition of the animal, and the general physiology of the animal. The feeding of Pinus ponderosa needles to late pregnant cattle results in an abortion in from 3 days to 3 weeks, with most occurring 5-15 days after the initiation of daily feeding. Although Pinus ponderosa needle abortion is a common name for the syndrome afflicting cattle, it is in some ways misleading, since abortion is normally taken to mean expulsion of a nonviable fetus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPlant and fungal interactionsFrench-language works237,207