MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Biomedical Apparatuses or Conviviality?

2020· article· en· W3013876857 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Greg Bird

Bibliographic record

VenueTOPIA Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedical, Sociocultural, and Biopolitical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPandemicDeclarationCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Government (linguistics)State of emergency2019-20 coronavirus outbreakState (computer science)Political scienceSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Irrational numberState of exceptionLawMedicinePhilosophyVirologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Greg Bird shares this essay in response to the 2020 COVID-19 / coronavirus pandemic. On February 26, 2020 Giorgio Agamben criticized the Italian Government’s “frantic, irrational, and absolutely unwarranted” declaration of a state of emergency (2020a). Questioning the severity of the danger, he argued that there were two underlying factors explaining the government’s “disproportionate response”: the state of exception has become the “normal governmental paradigm” and the widespread fear and panic amongst the people. A pandemic of a different sort had spread and the only solution available was to contain it with a lockdown.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.995
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.038
Scholarly communication0.0090.010
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0060.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.193
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTOPIA Canadian Journal of Cultural StudiesSame topicMedical, Sociocultural, and Biopolitical StudiesFrench-language works237,207