MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Biomedical Apparatuses or Conviviality?

2020· article· en· W3013876857 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Greg Bird

Bibliographic record

VenueTOPIA Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedical, Sociocultural, and Biopolitical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPandemicDeclarationCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Government (linguistics)State of emergency2019-20 coronavirus outbreakState (computer science)Political scienceSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Irrational numberState of exceptionLawMedicinePhilosophyVirologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Greg Bird shares this essay in response to the 2020 COVID-19 / coronavirus pandemic. On February 26, 2020 Giorgio Agamben criticized the Italian Government’s “frantic, irrational, and absolutely unwarranted” declaration of a state of emergency (2020a). Questioning the severity of the danger, he argued that there were two underlying factors explaining the government’s “disproportionate response”: the state of exception has become the “normal governmental paradigm” and the widespread fear and panic amongst the people. A pandemic of a different sort had spread and the only solution available was to contain it with a lockdown.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.389
Threshold uncertainty score0.987

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.193
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTOPIA Canadian Journal of Cultural StudiesSame topicMedical, Sociocultural, and Biopolitical StudiesFrench-language works237,207