MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3013886473

Derecho Comparado de las pensiones por vejez en dos sistemas diversos de protección social: México-Canadá

2020· article· es· W3013886473 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gabriela Mendizábal Bermúdez, Gloria Moreno Álvarez

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldMedicine
TopicAging, Health, and Disability
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El rapido envejecimiento de la poblacion presenta desafios y oportunidades para cualquier pais lo que nos lleve a preguntar sobre las posibilidades de resolver necesidades basicas como el ingreso para la poblacion de edad avanzada. Mas aun, el aumento de la movilidad de la poblacion en todo el mundo, y el aumento del intercambio comercial entre paises hace que el estudio de Derecho Comparado sea esencial. Por esta razon, este articulo presenta los resultados de una investigacion legal comparativa sobre pensiones de vejez en Mexico y Canada, lo que permite establecer bases para discutir problemas y soluciones comunes, diferencias estructurales y posibles instrumentos de cooperacion internacional entre ambos paises. La investigacion muestra tipos de beneficios para personas mayores, sus requisitos para obtenerlos en ambos paises.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAging, Health, and DisabilityFrench-language works237,207