Impact of <i>b</i> ‐value on estimates of apparent fibre density
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Recent advances in diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) analysis techniques have improved our understanding of fibre‐specific variations in white matter microstructure. Increasingly, studies are adopting multi‐shell dMRI acquisitions to improve the robustness of dMRI‐based inferences. However, the impact of b ‐value choice on the estimation of dMRI measures such as apparent fibre density (AFD) derived from spherical deconvolution is not known. Here, we investigate the impact of b ‐value sampling scheme on estimates of AFD. First, we performed simulations to assess the correspondence between AFD and simulated intra‐axonal signal fraction across multiple b ‐value sampling schemes. We then studied the impact of sampling scheme on the relationship between AFD and age in a developmental population ( n = 78) aged 8–18 (mean = 12.4, SD = 2.9 years) using hierarchical clustering and whole brain fixel‐based analyses. Multi‐shell dMRI data were collected at 3.0T using ultra‐strong gradients (300 mT/m), using 6 diffusion‐weighted shells ranging from b = 0 to 6,000 s/mm 2 . Simulations revealed that the correspondence between estimated AFD and simulated intra‐axonal signal fraction was improved with high b ‐value shells due to increased suppression of the extra‐axonal signal. These results were supported by in vivo data, as sensitivity to developmental age‐relationships was improved with increasing b ‐value ( b = 6,000 s/mm 2 , median R 2 = .34; b = 4,000 s/mm 2 , median R 2 = .29; b = 2,400 s/mm 2 , median R 2 = .21; b = 1,200 s/mm 2 , median R 2 = .17) in a tract‐specific fashion. Overall, estimates of AFD and age‐related microstructural development were better characterised at high diffusion‐weightings due to improved correspondence with intra‐axonal properties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.048 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".