Synthesis of Exo‐ and Endocyclic Enamides Through Copper‐Catalyzed Regioselective Intramolecular <i>N</i>‐Halovinylation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cross‐couplings between amides and 1,2‐dihaloalkenes are an efficient and straightforward way to access β‐haloenamides which, in turn, can be functionalized into complex, stereodefined enamide motifs. However, the intramolecular version of these cross‐couplings, leading to cyclic β‐haloenamides, has not been formally studied. In this paper, we report an investigation of factors affecting the efficiency of the reaction and its selectivity between potential exo and endo cyclization products. We demonstrate that exo/endo selectivity is largely determined by ring strain, whether it arises from the size of the resulting ring or from the structure of the starting compound, but that selectivity can also be modulated by varying reaction conditions. Finally, we show that resulting β‐haloenamides readily undergo transition metal‐catalyzed reactions, making this sequence a viable way to access highly functionalized cyclic enamides.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".