MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3013911321 · doi:10.1080/13621718.2020.1742472

A review on the laser welding of coated 22MnB5 press-hardened steel and its impact on the production of tailor-welded blanks

2020· review· en· W3013911321 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueScience and Technology of Welding & Joining · 2020
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrostructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsWeldingMaterials scienceMetallurgyLaser beam weldingLaserComposite materialOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The current demand for vehicles with high fuel efficiency, improved safety and enhanced crashworthiness qualities is being met by making use of high strength components with tailored mechanical properties which are made using tailor-welded blanks. During their production, the surface of the blank needs to be protected against oxidation and decarburisation. Protective coatings are used to protect the steel surface, with Aluminium-Silicon or Zinc-based coatings being the most popular. This work provides a review on the state-of-the-art as well as the issues associated with the laser welding of coated 22MnB5 grade steel to be used in the production of tailor-welded blanks. The paper provides a summary of existing solutions available to overcome these issues while discussing their limitations and the potential for future work.List of Abbreviations and Symbols: AHSS: Advanced-high Strength Steel; UHSS: Ultra-high Strength Steel; UTS: Ultimate Tensile Strength; PHS: Press-hardened Steel; HS: Hot Stamping; AR: As received; LWB: Laser-welded Blank; TWB: Tailor-welded Blank; ARW: As-received Welded; ARWHS: As-received Welded then Hot-Stamped; HSW: Hot-Stamped then Welded; BM: Base Material; HSBM: Hot-Stamped Base Material; BOP: Bead-on-Plate; CR: Cooling Rate; DIC: Digital Image Correlation; DP: Dual Phase; EPMA: Electron Probe Micro-Analyzer; EDX: Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy; FLW: Fibre Laser Welding; FZ: Fusion Zone; GI: Galvanised; GA: Galvannealed; HAZ: Heat-affected Zone; LBW: Laser Beam Welding; LME: Liquid Metal Embrittlement; PAG: Prior Austenite Grains; BIW: Body-in-white

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.872
Threshold uncertainty score0.486

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it