MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3013938526 · doi:10.18280/isi.250104

AI Data Driven Approach-Based Endogenous Inputs for Global Solar Radiation Forecasting

2020· article· fr· W3013938526 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mohammed Ali Jallal, Abdessalam El Yassini, Samira Chabaa, Abdelouhab Zeroual, Saïda Ibnyaich

Bibliographic record

VenueIngénierie des systèmes d information · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicSolar Radiation and Photovoltaics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadiationMeteorologyEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceGeographyPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Controlling the random nature of renewable energy sources such as solar radiation at ground, allows electric grid operators to better integrate it. In this paper, an intelligent datadriven model based on artificial neural network with autoregressive input sequence is developed to forecast the global solar radiation (GSR) time series on a half hour resolution in the site of Agdal, Marrakesh, Morocco. The database that is used to create this model was divided into two subsets. The first subset is used for training the proposed model on the data measured during the year 2008 by adopting three efficient optimizers (levenbergmarquardt, resilient backpropagation, and scaled conjugate gradient). The second subset is used for testing the efficiency and the robustness of the developed model to generate accurate predictions during the next six years (from 2009 to 2014). The obtained results demonstrate the accuracy and the stability of the proposed data-driven model to perform prediction in case of GSR measurements intermittence or sensor damage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIngénierie des systèmes d informationSame topicSolar Radiation and PhotovoltaicsFrench-language works237,207