MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3013959420 · doi:10.4000/italies.6872

Mens sana in corpore sano

2019· article· en· W3013959420 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueItalies · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMartial Arts: Techniques, Psychology, and Education
Canadian institutionsCanada Research ChairsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La Renaissance accorde une place importante, au sein de l’éducation, aux exercices physiques, à la gymnastique et aux jeux sportifs. Il s’agit donc d’étudier comment la culture éducative des xve et xvie siècles italiens fait sienne la maxime tirée de Juvénal « Mens sana in corpore sano », en intégrant le sport à la fois de manière théorique dans trois traités majeurs (Vegio, De Educatione liberorum, 1491 ; Alberti, Della Famiglia, 1430-1440 ; Piccolomini, De Liberorum Educatione, 1450), dans la pratique au sein de la Casa Giocosa fondée en 1423 à Mantoue par Vittorino da Feltre mais aussi de manière emblématique dans quelques portraits de la peinture italienne où les instruments servant à pratiquer les sports deviennent les attributs d’une position sociale. Dans la formation de l’homme de bien, les exercices physiques sont primordiaux à la fois comme préparation militaire et comme nécessité hygiéniste et médicale, au point qu’il convient de les afficher pour la postérité.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.650
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it