Predictors of institutional delivery service utilization among women of reproductive age in Gambia: a cross-sectional analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Over the last two decades, Gambia has made noticeable progress in the reducing the high maternal mortality rates and improving child survival rates. Nonetheless, numerous infrastructural and financial constraints continue to restrict access to institutional delivery care, a key component of achieving the maternal and child health related Sustainable Development Goals (SDG 3.1). This study assesses factors that predict women's choice of mode and place of delivery in urban and rural Gambia. METHODS: Cross-sectional data from the latest round of Gambia Demographic and Health Survey (2013) on women aged 15-49 years (n = 5351) were analyzed. The outcome measures were place (home vs health facility) and mode of delivery (caesarean vs normal) in urban and rural Gambia. Data were analyzed using descriptive and multivariate regression methods. RESULTS: About three-fifth (60.8%) of the participants had their last childbirth at a health facility and 39.2% at their home. There was a significant urban-rural difference in the prevalence of facility delivery with 86.9% of the urban women choosing health facility over home compared with 45.8% among the rural women. In the regression analysis, place of residence, education of participants and the husband, employment, parity and use of antenatal care were significantly associated with the use of health facility delivery services. For instance, having secondary [OR = 1.657, 95%CI = 1.337,2.053] and higher education [OR-2.451, 95%CI = 1.166,5.150] showed higher odds for using facility delivery services; and women from the richest wealth quintile had significantly higher [OR = 2.239, 95%CI = 1.525,3.289] odds of using facility delivery compared with those in the lowest quintile. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest a sub-optimal use of professional childbirth services among Gambian women which appears to be driven by various geographical, educational, wealth inequality, parity and low use of ANC services. Addressing the socioeconomic and demographic inequalities may lead to a more widespread usage of maternity services in Gambia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".