Temporal trends in associations between ozone and circulatory mortality in age and sex in Canada during 1984–2012
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Considerable research has been conducted on the association between ground-level ozone (ozone) and various causes of mortality, but the relationships by age and sex (biological) have been inconsistent, and temporal trends remain unexplored. OBJECTIVES: The study goals are to investigate the adverse health effects of short-term exposure to ozone on circulatory mortality by age and sex, and to examine trends in annual health effects. METHODS: Daily ozone, temperature, and circulatory mortality counts (ICD I00-I99) were collected for 24 urban cities for 29 years (1984-2012). Associations between ozone and circulatory mortality were estimated using generalized additive Poisson models for season (warm vs. cold), age [base (≥1) vs. seniors (>65)], and sex, accounting for confounders (calendar-time, temperature, day of the week). City-specific estimates were pooled to represent national associations through Bayesian hierarchical models. RESULTS: While the cold season returned insignificant estimates, the warm season showed statistically significant associations: a 10 ppb increase in ozone was associated with 0.7% increase in circulatory mortality with a 95% posterior interval of 0.2%, 1.1%. One-day lagged ozone in the warm season showed little age differences [0.7% (0.23%, 1.12%) vs. 0.8% (0.22%, 1.27%)], but visible sex differences: females were at a higher circulatory mortality risk than males [1.1% (0.31%, 1.71%) vs. 0.3% (-0.46%, 0.98%)]. Annual estimates suggest overall up-down temporal changes; a slightly increasing trend until 2002-2004, and a generally decreasing trend thereafter. CONCLUSION: This study found noticeable sex-related differences in circulatory mortality attributable to short-term exposure to ozone. Further research is warranted to understand whether sex alone, or unknown interactions with other factors derived the differences, and to clarify the specific biological mechanisms underlying differences in risk estimates between females and males.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".