MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3014069282 · doi:10.1039/d0cc00449a

Carbon-11 carboxylation of trialkoxysilane and trimethylsilane derivatives using [ <sup>11</sup> C]CO <sub>2</sub>

2020· article· en· W3014069282 on OpenAlexaff
Salvatore Bongarzone, Nicola Raucci, Igor C. Fontana, Federico Luzi, Antony D. Gee

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Communications · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicChemical Reactions and Isotopes
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas Hospital
FundersFP7 People: Marie-Curie ActionsMedical Research CouncilEuropean CommissionKing's College LondonEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorWellcome Trust
KeywordsCarboxylationRadiosynthesisTrimethylsilaneChemistryCarbon fibersCarbon-14Carbon oxideRadiochemistryOrganic chemistryCarbon monoxideMaterials sciencePhysicsNuclear physicsCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A simple and rapid carbon-11 carboxylation radiosynthesis method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.199
GPT teacher head0.427
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical CommunicationsSame topicChemical Reactions and IsotopesFrench-language works237,207