Predicting Human lncRNA-Disease Associations Based on Geometric Matrix Completion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recently, increasing evidences reveal that dysregulations of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are relevant to diverse diseases. However, the number of experimentally verified lncRNA-disease associations is limited. Prioritizing potential associations is beneficial not only for disease diagnosis, but also disease treatment, more important apprehending disease mechanisms at lncRNA level. Various computational methods have been proposed, but precise prediction and full use of data's intrinsic structure are still challenging. In this work, we design a new method, denominated GMCLDA (Geometric Matrix Completion lncRNA-Disease Association), to infer underlying associations based on geometric matrix completion. Utilizing association patterns among functionally similar lncRNAs and phenotypically similar diseases, GMCLCA makes use of the intrinsic structure embedded in the association matrix. Besides, limiting the scope of the predicted values gives rise to a certain sparsity in computation and enhances the robustness of GMCLDA. GMCLDA computes disease semantic similarity according to the Disease Ontology (DO) hierarchy and lncRNA Gaussian interaction profile kernel similarity according to known interaction profiles. Then, GMCLDA measures lncRNA sequence similarity using Needleman-Wunsch algorithm. For a new lncRNA, GMCLDA prefills interaction profile on account of its K-nearest neighbors defined by sequence similarity. Finally, GMCLDA estimates the missing entries of the association matrix based on geometric matrix completion model. Compared with state-of-the-art methods, GMCLDA can provide more accurate lncRNA-disease prediction. Further case studies prove that GMCLDA is able to correctly infer possible lncRNAs for renal cancer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".