MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3014172421 · doi:10.3390/math8040526

Mathematical Aspects of Krätzel Integral and Krätzel Transform

2020· article· en· W3014172421 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStatistical Mechanics and Entropy
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntegral transformMellin transformMathematicsTwo-sided Laplace transformKernel (algebra)Bessel functionMellin inversion theoremScalar (mathematics)Daniell integralConnection (principal bundle)Multiple integralLaplace transformPure mathematicsFourier transformMathematical analysisAlgebra over a fieldFractional Fourier transformApplied mathematicsIntegral equationFourier integral operatorFourier analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A real scalar variable integral is known in the literature by different names in different disciplines. It is basically a Bessel integral called specifically Krätzel integral. An integral transform with this Krätzel function as kernel is known as Krätzel transform. This article examines some mathematical properties of Krätzel integral, its connection to Mellin convolutions and statistical distributions, its computable representations, and its extensions to multivariate and matrix-variate cases, in both the real and complex domains. An extension in the pathway family of functions is also explored.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.918
Threshold uncertainty score0.877

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it