MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Flexible Genome-Scale Resource of SARS-CoV-2 Coding Sequence Clones

2020· preprint· en· W3014191859 on OpenAlexafffund
Dae‐Kyum Kim, Jennifer J. Knapp, Da Kuang, Patricia Cassonnet, Payman Samavarchi‐Tehrani, Hala Abdouni, Ashyad Rayhan, Dayag Sheykhkarimli, Étienne Coyaud, Sylvie van der Werf, Caroline Demeret, Anne‐Claude Gingras, Brian Raught, Yves Jacob, Frederick P. Roth

Bibliographic record

VenuePreprints.org · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreSinai Health SystemLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Research Foundation
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)GenomeComputational biologySevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Viral life cycleBiologyCoding regionPandemic2019-20 coronavirus outbreakCoronavirusVirologyComputer scienceGeneticsGeneMedicineInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The world is facing a major health crisis, the global pandemic of COVID-19 caused by the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus, for which no approved antiviral agents or vaccines are currently available. Here we describe a collection of codon-optimized coding sequences for SARS-CoV-2 cloned into Gateway-compatible entry vectors, which enable rapid transfer into a variety of expression and tagging vectors. The collection is freely available via Addgene. We hope that widespread availability of this SARS-CoV-2 resource will enable many subsequent molecular studies to better understand the viral life cycle and how to block it.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.041

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.319
GPT teacher head0.438
Teacher spread0.119 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePreprints.orgSame topicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchFrench-language works237,207