MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3014215068 · doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ab84c9

Focal Plane Wavefront Sensing with the FAST TGV Coronagraph

2020· article· en· W3014215068 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenuePublications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdaptive optics and wavefront sensing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCoronagraphWavefrontAdaptive opticsCardinal pointDeformable mirrorExoplanetSpeckle patternDiffraction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The continual push to directly image exoplanets at lower masses and closer separations orbiting around bright stars remains limited by both quasi-static and residual adaptive optics aberration. In previous papers we have proposed a modification of the self-coherent camera (SCC) design to address both of these limitations, called the Fast Atmospheric SCC Technique (FAST). In this paper we introduce an additional modification to the FAST focal plane mask design, including the existing Tip/tilt and Gaussian components and adding a charge four Vortex (TGV) component. In addition to boosting SCC fringe signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) as in our previous design, we show that the FAST TGV mask is also optimized to reach high contrast at separations closer to the star. In this paper we use numerical simulations to consider the performance improvement on correcting quasi-static aberration using this new mask compared to the previously proposed Tip/tilt+Gaussian mask. Using active deformable mirror control to generate a calibrated half dark hole improves contrast by a factor of about 200 at 2–5 λ/D and up to a factor of 10 at 5–20 λ/D. The new methodology presented in this paper, now simultaneously considering both contrast and fringe S/N, opens the door to a new ideology of coronagraph design, where the coronagraph is now considered in duality as both a diffraction attenuator and a wavefront sensor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.146
Threshold uncertainty score0.336

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePublications of the Astronomical Society of the PacificSame topicAdaptive optics and wavefront sensingFrench-language works237,207