TOTALITARISMO DE MERCADO E RACIONALIDADE NEOLIBERAL NA EDUCAÇÃO BRASILEIRA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neste ensaio, abordamos o tema da educação e elegemos como objeto de investigação as reformas educacionais brasileiras das últimas três décadas, buscando compreender os fundamentos e as intencionalidades que as direcionam. O problema que orientou nossas análises foi a questão: como interpretar as recentes reformas educacionais a partir dos conceitos de totalitarismo de mercado, racionalidade neoliberal e estado de exceção? Conceitos que foram referenciados em Dardot e Laval, Benjamin e Agamben. Como objetivos, propomos caracterizar o totalitarismo de mercado e indicar como essa forma econômico-política afeta os serviços públicos e o funcionamento do próprio Estado; e interpretar algumas das recentes reformas educacionais brasileiras, referenciadas no conceito de racionalidade neoliberal. Como resultados de investigação, argumentamos que as reformas educacionais se aproximam da lógica empresarial, e aquilo que se apresenta como progresso leva à regressão; portanto, à exclusão econômica e cultural de toda a sociedade.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".