ROLE OF VARIOUS REPORTS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY IN THE BUSINESS CONTEXT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The concept of environmental sustainability is gaining more importance all over the globe. As per opinion of the environmentalist, the rising of global temperature, melting of ice-berg and glaciers in the polar region and rising of the sea level, etc. are the continued phenomenon which will bring severe hazards in the life of the coming generation. This life threatening problem has arisen mainly due to the malpractices of the businessmen by putting undue pressure on the environment because of lack of awareness of them about the tolerance power of the environment and due to their self-centred attitude which is the starting point of unsustainability. Therefore, different steps had been taken at international level through different conventions for example, Stockholm Convention (1972), Montreal Protocol (1987), Kyoto protocol (1993), etc. and at national level appropriate bodies have been established for framing and implementing different environmental laws to control the activities leading to environmental unsustainability. Accounting guidelines has also been framed by different accounting bodies for the disclosure of the effect of business activities relating to environment. In spite of that, environmental imbalance is a recurring feature which is severely threatening the lives of the future generation as global temperature is increasing day by day though ozone layer depletion is gradually decreasing. Therefore, the effectiveness of these treaties and accounting guidelines is a matter of question. Obviously, the provisions of these treaties or accounting guidelines have been In the above backdrop, the researcher taken an interesting yet risky venture, to unveil how far the reports play the pivotal role to control and prevent activities of the businessmen leading to unsustainability of the environment and to make them compelled to follow green business practices as a holistic approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.052 | 0.165 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.017 | 0.029 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.042 | 0.023 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".