MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3014307577 · doi:10.18280/jesa.530109

DPC Based on ANFIS Super-Twisting Sliding Mode Algorithm of a Doubly-Fed Induction Generator for Wind Energy System

2020· article· en· W3014307577 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Habib Benbouhenni, Zinelaabidine Boudjema, A. Belaidi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWind Turbine Control Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInduction generatorControl theory (sociology)Adaptive neuro fuzzy inference systemDoubly fed electric machineMode (computer interface)Generator (circuit theory)Wind powerComputer scienceMaterials scienceAlgorithmPhysicsEngineeringElectrical engineeringArtificial intelligencePower (physics)VoltageAC power

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Conventional direct power control (DPC) using two hysteresis comparators and switching table for a doubly fed induction generator (DFIG) integrated in a wind turbine system (WTS) have some drawbacks such as harmonic distortion of voltages, reduced robustness and powers ripples.In order to resolve these problems, a super-twisting sliding mode control (STSMC) scheme based on adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) algorithm is employed.The validity of the employed approach was tested by using Matlab/Simulink software.Interesting simulation results were obtained and remarkable advantages of the proposed strategy were exposed including simple design of the control system, reduced powers ripples as well as the other advantages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Européen des Systèmes AutomatisésSame topicWind Turbine Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207