MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

First limits on double beta decays in $$^\mathbf{232}$$Th

2020· article· lv· W3014325095 on OpenAlexaff
M. Laubenstein, B. Lehnert, S.S. Nagorny

Bibliographic record

VenueThe European Physical Journal C · 2020
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDouble beta decayPhysicsBeta decayExcited stateHalf-lifeNuclear physicsIsotopeDecay schemeNuclear isomerRadioactive decayNeutrinoGamma ray

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract As one of the primordial radioactive isotopes, $$^{232}\mathrm{Th}$$ 232Th mainly undergoes $$\alpha $$ α -decay with a half-life of $$1.402\cdot 10^{10}$$ 1.402·1010 years. However, it is also one of 35 double beta decay candidates in which the single $$\beta $$ β -decay is forbidden or strongly suppressed. 181 mg of thorium contained in a gas mantle were measured in a HPGe well-detector at the Gran Sasso Underground Laboratory with a total exposure of 3.25 g $$\times $$ × d. We obtain half-life limits on all double beta decay modes of $$^{232}\mathrm{Th}$$ 232Th to excited states of $$^{232}\mathrm{U}$$ 232U on the order of $$10^{11-15}$$ 1011-15 years. For the most likely transition into the 0 $$^+_1$$ 1+ state we find a lower half-life limit of $$6.7\cdot 10^{14}$$ 6.7·1014 years (90% C.I.). These are the first constraints on double beta decay excited state transition in $$^{232}\mathrm{Th}$$ 232Th .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe European Physical Journal CSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207