MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3014327691 · doi:10.1111/ejss.12966

Nitrogen, water content, phosphorus and active iron jointly regulate soil organic carbon in tropical acid red soil forest

2020· article· en· W3014327691 on OpenAlexaff
Jinyue Bai, Mingming Zong, Shiyu Li, Haixia Li, Changqun Duan, Yuan Feng, Changhui Peng, Xiaoling Zhang, Di Sun, Chen Lin, Yucheng Shi, Guangyu Zheng, Haidong Wang, Daxiang Liu, Fengrui Li, Wuping Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Soil Science · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsSoil carbonEnvironmental scienceRed soilSoil pHEnvironmental chemistryPhosphorusChemistrySoil waterSoil science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Increasing forest soil organic carbon (SOC) storage is important for reducing carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions from terrestrial ecosystems and mitigating global climate change. Although the effects of altitude, temperature and rainfall on organic carbon have been studied extensively, it is difficult to increase SOC storage by changing these factors in actual forest management. This study determined the SOC, soil physical and chemical properties, nutrient elements, heavy metal elements, soil minerals and microbial biomass in the 0–140‐cm soil layer of the monsoon broad‐leaved forest in the acid red soil region of southwestern China by stratification. We tried to identify the soil factors affecting the SOC storage of the forest in the acid red soil region and determine the weights of the factors affecting the SOC, with the aim of improving the SOC retention capacity in forest management by changing the main soil factors affecting SOC storage. The results showed that the soil factors affecting the forest SOC storage in this area are total nitrogen (N, 22.7%) > soil water content (19.9%) > active iron (including poorly crystalline iron, Fe o , 15.5%) > pH (9.5%) > phosphorus (P, 9.4%) > aluminium (Al, 8.9%) > silicon (Si, 7.1%) > sulphur (S, 6.8%). Of these factors, N, the water content, Fe o , and P are practical factors for forest management, whereas the pH, Al, Si and S are not. SOC was significantly positively correlated with the soil N concentration, water content, active iron content and P concentration ( p < .05). In acidic red soil areas, with active iron as the highlight, N, soil water content, phosphorus and active iron jointly regulate the forest SOC storage capacity. Consequently, in actual forest management, any measures to promote soil N and water content and to activate inactive iron can enhance the storage of SOC, as appropriate input of N and P fertiliser and irrigation in dry years and the dry season. Highlights The soil environmental factors affecting SOC storage in forest soil are quantified Activation of inactive iron helps SOC storage in forest soil Irrigation and N and P input are effective for helping SOC storage in forest soil N, WC, P and Fe o jointly regulate SOC in tropical acid red soil forest

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Soil ScienceSame topicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsFrench-language works237,207